The Silent Heroes of the Second Revolutionary War (Updated 7/7/2019)

The Public Awakens 

Taking their cue from a Hillary Clinton campaign ad, thought elites regularly identify Patriots with extremism and bigotry. Anyone who espouses conservative thinking is tarnished with this brush. For example, the Program on Extremism at George Washington University in recent years published a white paper purporting to describe concerned Patriots as dangerous extremists with false views. Militias, a logical response to out-of-control border areas or street gangs, are termed "breeding grounds for hate." And the Anti-Defamation League specifically applies the term "hate" to those with non-Left points of view.

But as reality sets in after two years of the Trump presidency, reality has begun to impinge on the fantasies being pushed on the people--most prominently, giving birth to the "Walkaway" movement (led by a gay man) and the "Blexit" (Black Exit) and "Jexit" (Jewish exit) or "Jexodus" movements as well. 

Today, I was getting my morning coffee this when a woman (who happened to be a woman of color) saw my "Patriot" mug and asked me about the logo and my book. In response, I said that it was about our current undeclared civil war. 

"When you say that we are in a civil war, what do you mean?" she said.

How do you condense three to ten years of research into a single sentence?

So I said: "I mean the desperate opposition to President Trump, which is really opposition to America. And at the same time saving children from human trafficking, which goes on because of corruption."

Her eyes registered confusion at the first point, and recognition of the second. Multiple women of color, and one friend who is an Indigenous American, have told me that someone either tried to kidnap them as children in poor neighborhoods, or that they knew of such things and were concerned about why children seemed to be easy prey. One actually went on to become an activist against human trafficking.

These women have suffered not only at the hands of potential traffickers, but at the hands of the domestic courts, child protective services, and others who have "washed their hands" of their cases. There is money to be made on the side of the perpetrators, and no money on the side of the victims.

This is why the Trump Administration's fight against corruption, and its fight against human trafficking and child sex trafficking in particular, need to be seen as one thing. The President has gone to war with the predators on every front, particularly legislatively and financially.

Logic Dictates The Awakening and Its Questions

  • Logic dictates that if the media is 98% hostile to President Trump, and "incestuous" with Democrats, as Mark Levin claims in his new (and heavily researched) book, the law of simplicity dictates that the media is not about the truth. Rather, they are engaged in a conspiracy to overthrow the government even to the point of refusing to cover the Nation's traditional July 4th (Independence Day) festivities in Washington, DC.
  • Logic dictates that if President Trump is doing things that protect children from trafficking, but politicians push a narrative that he is akin to Hitler and is "terrorizing immigrant families," as well as calling Federal law enforcement agencies "radicalized, criminal" to the point where they should be "eliminated," then they have an agenda and cannot tell the truth. (Recall when they repeatedly denied there even was a border crisis, calling it "manufactured.")
  • Logic dictates that if Democrats are celebrating infanticide with a standing ovationignoring massive rape by human border smugglers (Kamala Harris actually promoted mothers sending their children with rapist coyote smugglers), teaching anal sex to minors in Teen Vogue, celebrating younger and younger sex ed in public schools, even to the point of kindergarten - then they are pro-pedophilia. (Not to mention Western European liberals in multiple countries ignoring a massive migrant rape wave.)
  • Similarly, logic dictates that if deep underground military bases exist, and California is home to more than 30 military bases, it must have such facilities in the state. As such, it is logical to ask whethergiven that the top priority of the Administration is protecting our nation's childrenthe the earthquakes in CA are actually the demolishing by President Trump of underground facilities doing illegitimate things to them.
  • The U.S. Geological Service calls it "partially fact" that humans can cause earthquakes, noting that "deep mining" may play a role, but otherwise, "other human activities have not been shown to trigger subsequent earthquakes." Yet if this is the case, why is there an international treaty prohibiting the use of just such weapons? The 1978 Environmental Modification Convention prohibits: "changingthrough the deliberate manipulation of natural processesthe dynamics, composition or structure of the earth" and binds each signatory "not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party."

Man-Made Earthquakes & Deep Underground Military Bases

Today, July 6, 2019, after multiple earthquakes hit California, the governor declared a state of emergency there. I believe that these earthquakes may be man-made, specifically the Trump Administration destroying deep underground military bases (DUMBs) with classified projects improperly involving children. Please note that this is only a hypothesis; the purpose of this article is explore it.

On December 5, 2011, an article appeared which asserted: "The Second American Revolution is secretly being fought – deep underground. U.S. soldiers are battling the CIA, Xe (BLackwater) mercenaries, FEMA and DHS agents and foreign troops (brought into the United States through the Denver International Airport DUMB)."

Until reading this, I thought underground military bases were possibly just a conspiracy theory. Further research yielded clarification, as more than three decades ago, in 1987, Lloyd A. Duscha gave a talk at a conference for engineers called “Underground Facilities for Defense – Experience and Lessons.”

At the time, Duscha was Deputy Director of Engineering and Construction for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (It is reprinted in this book.) He stated: "After World War II, political and economic factors changed the underground construction picture and caused a renewed interest to 'think underground.'...I must deviate a little because several of the most interesting facilities that have been designed and constructed by the Corps are classified."

"Classified" Means No Public Information Exists

What is going on in these deep underground facilities? We are not allowed to know; as such whatever does appear typically looks somewhat homemade, extreme, "wonky," and weird. (See here for example.) Does that make the information false? No; who would advertise the existence of such a thing?

Is it possible that someone is harming children as part of military experiments? Clearly, if we do not know what is going on, then anything is possible. (Recall when a group called Veterans On Patrol found a child trafficking camp with underground elements; was quickly discredited; and the site was reportedly demolished; the group that found the children claimed to have found and handed over forensic evidence.)

When Isaac Kappy died on May 13, 2019, a user going by the handle @yigsstarhouse posted the following comment to Twitter, quoting him: "Isaac Kappy: 'What I did was DUMB….DUMB, DUMB, DUMB.' Jumps from bridge in Bellemont, AZ where there just so happens to be a: Deep Underground Military Base >DUMB"

What is the connection between secret government programs such as classified DUMBs  (see also here, here and here) and "Pizzagate," "Pedogate," child sexual exploitation, child sex trafficking, human trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, illegal and unethical experiments, and so on?

Perhaps nothing. But I remember when fearless child advocate, journalist and survivor of relationship abuse Liz Crokin said that she had received a tip about "children in cages." (I do not have the link to video or a document proving this statement.) Crokin was a well-respected journalist until she started advocating for children. It is well-known that Crokin has been harassed and smeared for her work and claims.

"Children In Cages" and Immoral Equivalence

In any case, the term "children in cages" is very important to political radicals passing themselves off as Democrats. They are working hard to establish immoral equivalence between President Trump and his Administration, and "the swamp." As such, they accuse him of "keeping children in cages," although the reality is far from this.

(See comment here, for example, attacking Liz Crokin for speculating that wildfires in California were actually intentionally set by pedophiles to hide evidence. The person wrote: "Hey conspiracy theory a**holes, you support a guy who literally locked children in cages, you don't get to decide what is right for children anymore!")

In reality, the "cages" belong to an earlier era. The 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) creates a loophole in the deportation process for children who are from countries other than Mexico or Canada (at the time, the main focus was on countries south of Mexico at risk of being trafficked). The law was already considered out of date by experts in 2014, well before President Trump took office.

Per the Department of Homeland Security, this loophole has been exploited by bad actors and needs to be closed up so that only trafficking victims benefit from it, rather than all minors crossing without parents, who may or may not be victims.

No matter what the reality is, corrupt politicians and the media who amplify their messages must cling to the narrative. This is so no matter how many times you remind them that former President Bush passed the law and former President Obama was the one who implemented the family separation policy.

What Happened On August 23, 2011

Many people, myself included, believe that there was a "16 year plan to destroy America."

On December 5, 2011 (well into the first term of the Obama presidency; early on in this phase) someone published the article mentioned above, mentioning a "revolution" already underway, and the demolition of the Deep Underground Military Bases (DUMBs) was a primary element in this effort.

The author claimed that “evidence of these battles are presented daily through the USGS earthquake maps. Shallow, poorly constrained earthquakes at depths of 3 to 4 miles are, in all probability, caused by massive underground explosions at these DUMBs or their connecting tunnels.”

If this is true, the USGS denial of man-made earthquakes would seem to tie into the desire to conceal information.

If Patriots in the military were fighting back against a coup already in 2011, it would also support the contention by Jerome Corsi that the military was ready to take back the country by force in 2016 but agreed to step in and do things the normal way by recruiting Donald Trump as a candidate. Former State Department official Steve Pieczenik meanwhile referred to Hillary Clinton as attempting a "coup" and the transmission of documents to Wikileaks a "counter-coup" intended to stop her. (Here is another link on that.)

(As Divine Providence would have it, Hillary Clinton was so overconfident that she would win that she welcomed the Trump candidacy, envisioning him as a "Pied Piper" who would attract attention, but be easy to beat.)

In any case, the anonymous article further goes on to claim that:

"USGS earthquake maps have been recording these battles since August 23, 2011, the 1st day of the Second American Revolution."

Specifically, on August 23, 2011 "the United States Air Force intercepted a number of improvised nuclear explosive devices that were being transported by CIA / Xe forces via the DUMB underground tunnels to targets in New York City and Washington DC. The CIA / Xe planned on detonating those nukes in New York City and Washington DC as part of 9/11 anniversary false flag events. The false flag attacks were averted when the nukes were prematurely detonated during the underground battles between the United States military and CIA / Xe forces.”

The author claims that “the 5.8 magnitude tremor that rattled the entire East Coast, including Washington DC, was not a natural earthquake but an earthquake that resulted from an underground nuclear detonation.” (Or as Q says, “boom.”) Another article linked from this site substantiates the first one, noting that the seismograph of the earthquake that took place that day was missing "P" or "primary" waves, indicating that it was a nuclear detonation because "underground nuclear detonations are very violent and immediate with no forewarnings whatsoever."

The author states that he was "pointed to this piece of evidence by someone who claimed to be with the United States Air Force (see screenshot).

A commenter to the article responds to the obvious question of how they would excavate tunnels underground without us seeing evidence above ground. They point us to “United States Patent 3,693,731 – METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TUNNELING BY MELTING," granted in 1972 to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.

On August 23, 2011,  The Air Force stopped the attacks on DC/NY. On May 30, 2019, the President delivered the commencement speech to graduates of the Academy. He stated: "You are ready to fly, fight, and win!"

The President's words are even more poignant when one remembers the brutal events of September 11, 2011. I believe that when the attackers failed to take down DC and New York, because the Air Force detonated their nukes, the plan changed and they attacked our consulate in Benghazi, murdering Ambassador Christopher Stevens and those with him: Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty, and Sean Patrick Smith. 

As such, the below photo is completely manufactured.

Note: This post has been updated to correct some minor typos and add some links. Of course, today’s discussion does not prove that California’s earthquakes are unnatural, rather it only provides an interesting alternative view to pursue.
By Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal. All opinions are the author's own. Public domain. Read the full thread here.

Image by spencer from Pixabay

Stopping The Exploding Border Crisis At Its Source

The problem with trying to measure illegal immigration is obvious: You don't know how many crossers you did NOT intercept.  Therefore, the government relies on trends. Over the past decade, the trend has been for the numbers to decline. However, between FY2017 and FY2019, the numbers have risen sharply, per U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
  • FY17: 310,531
  • FY18: 404,142
  • FY19 to date (4 months left in the year): 598,714. 
  • This means that if current trends continue, that number will be 898,071 (see chart).
We share a planet, and any discussion of policy should begin with that basic human fact. 
Photo via Pixabay.
However, rational sharing takes place in a rational manner, one in which there are rules by which both sides abide.

Along these lines, finally there is mainstream recognition of the crisis at the southern border. after repeated denials and attempts to call it "manufactured."

In late March 2019, Acting Department of Homeland Security Chief Kevin McAleenan said we had reached "the breaking point." Vice-President Pence, in late June, said that DHS is "overwhelmed" and needs Congress to provide funding to handle it. 

The U.S. strategy for dealing with uncontrolled and uncontrollable illegal migration is to stop the problem at the source, as Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan mentioned in his press conference on June 28, 2019.

Mexico is the source, either directly or as a middleman between countries further south and the United States.

This is Andrés Manuel López Obrador, President of Mexico. President Trump threatened the President of Mexico with tariffs unless he agreed to help.

Obrador agreed

The Mexican police had to get involved.

Obrador sent the Mexican police and the Mexican National Guard to the border to stop the smuggling. (Note in this photo that the adult and child do not resemble one another.)

The Mexican police are resisting. Per the Washington Times"Government officials blamed the political opposition, corrupt federal police and outside players Thursday for a revolt by officers who are opposed to being absorbed into Mexico’s new National Guard." 

An unsourced, anonymous message on the "Godlike Productions" forum states:
"Soros bought off the Federal police - paying them to not follow the president's orders. As a result, Obrador is going to rip away all their benefits, reduce their pay, and merge them with the National Guard....The Federal Police are saying HELL NO, and blocking roads and creating chaos, but...Obrador has this in the bag. The once highly paid police force is now going to be sleeping in tents rather than posh hotels, & their pay is going to be cut ENORMOUSLY."
The message poster notes that the media attacks Obrador just as they do President Trump, and he is even blamed for talking to our President! Al Jazeera:
"US President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs on Mexico if Lopez Obrador doesn't halt illegal migration to the US by June 10 - a move that stressed the relationship between both countries. Obrador Lopez sent Trump a letter calling for the avoidance of confrontation, and Friday morning, he said he would respond to Trump's threats with "great prudence", sending off his finance minister to negotiate with Washington.
In response, markets in both countries reacted, stocks tumbled and the Mexican peso lost value against the US dollar."
Nevertheless, this anonymous source believes that the strategy we are currently employing with Mexico to stop the flow of illegal aliens will ultimately work:
"PREDICTION: The border is gonna become an abandoned zone. From the Mexican side. The migrant crisis will be over soon. Obrador is NOT CORRUPTIBLE."
Free photo via Pixabay.
In the end, let's hope that the border crisis disappears, along with the corruption that declared it a non-story until it became politically expedient to reverse course.

By Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal. All opinions are the author's own and do not represent her employer or any other entity. Public domain.

July 4, 2019: To Freedom

Carrying the Betsy Ross flag
Today, July 4, 2019, we attended the Independence Day Parade in Washington, DC. Overall a very happy and positive feeling. Some video:
Photos are available at Flickr. My favorite--
Go Q!

Some photos from the parade:

Hoke County High School Mighty Marching Bucks
Sikhs of America
Greater Washington DC Chinese-American Society
As an observation, today it was like the normal (meaning non-extremist) people had taken over DC, and it was so refreshing, as the reality is not at all what you see on TV.

Thankfully the violent people were kept out by the police and TSA, who were working closely together to keep everyone safe.
TSA checkpoint
From what I could tell, the Trump opponents who were there today seemed like a small minority of "sour grapes."

They seem mostly Caucasian from what I can tell, too: Minorities appear to love him. (One man was selling "Don't F*ck With The USA" T-shirts.) Another break in the narrative.

An additional point. It felt to me like the people who came to DC today were not just a little patriotic - they were really committed. They were literally wearing the flag. Wearing clothes, pants, hats with literal flags on them. This is a wellspring of love, not hate, and it runs so deep.
Every variation of our national colors was the theme of the day.
Great dress.
Great shirt.
It was like we were shouting with joy just to be there, and to be alive, and not afraid of the extremists who seem to appear at every turn, and whose mouths seem to fill every microphoneyet not to actually reflect the views of the mainstream at all. 

It was a great feeling of relief.
We took some time to visit the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.
Thank you to those who have made the ultimate sacrifice.
Some people do hold deeply principled disagreements with the Administration, of course. However, it seems to me that many of them are simply disagreeing with the image they see on TV, which is totally distorted.

I couldn't tell what these people were about, but diversity of opinion is crucial to who we are, so long as it's peaceful.
Thank God for the First Amendment.
On the train today, one woman had a sign, "respect all humans" - well if you're watching the mainstream news what would you think? (Actually nothing, today; they boycotted the parade.)

Unfortunately it seems to me that the Deep State (DS) plays both sides of this equation. 

What is the DS? To me, the term includes the "administrative state," the "shadow government," "rogue intelligence," the "military-industrial complex," and so on - it does not include government and law enforcement agencies simply doing their jobs according to the law.

Remember when the FBI infiltrated the Black Liberation Movement in the mid-20th century or in more recent years, when they have been accused of manipulating vulnerable subjects into planning radical Islamic terror attacks, then arresting them. Thus the popularity of this meme:

I believe the DS is creating a narrative around white nationalism (recall when the FBI said it "lost its files" on the white nationalist website Stormfront and got caught trolling 8chan to "redirect" suspicions away from the CIA and Mossad and toward Russia.) 

This is not to say that white nationalists or radical Islamic terrorists are not a domestic terror threat, because they clearly are; only that the DS has a way of weaponizing, amplifying and distorting reality for their own aims.

Look as well at the list of hidden radical leftist financial support provided to various organizations by George Soros, who seeks both to destablize countries and to profit off of their destabilization

Look at how Hillary Clinton's campaign in 2016 made a concerted effort to tie then-candidate Trump to the "KKK" and "racism," knowing it was a lie. (Recall the reality in contrast, when Jesse Jackson expressed his appreciation to Trump for a "lifetime of service to the African-American community.")

Whoever the DS is, it is pathetic; it cannot allow the people to be happy at all.That was part of why I wanted to go to the parade today, to show what the reality is. Whatever it is, no spin.

In that vein, let me share that I did see at least twice that Trump supporters went over to people carrying protest signs or those (stupid) Trump balloons - they wanted to talk and share their point of view. 

We are a smart group of people, inclined to unity, open to dialogue, and that is precisely why the radical Left is so keen to censor.

In fact, I think, the articulate nature of Trump supporters is precisely what so enrages the elite intellectual class, which ironically calls itself the "Democrats." They are so used to thinking of themselves as the know-it-alls; populism is a direct threat to their influence; yes, their privilege.

Even so, it is unfathomable to me how anyone could light a Secret Service agent on fire as tragically happened today, with a burning American flag, in front of the White House. Sending two to the hospital
But what do you expect when Members of Congress are calling Federal law enforcement "radicalized, criminal," as Rep. Ayanna Pressley did:
"ICE & CBP - radicalized, criminal agencies - are destroying families &  killing innocent children. It is absolutely unconscionable to even consider giving one more dollar to support agencies that openly commit human rights abuses. #NotOneDollar #DefundHate"
What do you expect when Members of Congress say that a Federal law enforcement agency is "rogue" and should be "eliminated," as Rep. Ilhan Omar stated?

Our President was protected tonight. Thank God. 
The Hill and Yahoo! News carried some of the quotes from his speech.
  • "That same American Spirit that emboldened our founders has kept us strong throughout our history. To this day, that spirit runs through the veins of every American patriot. It lives on in each and every one of you."
  • "As long as we stay true to our cause, as long as we remember our great history and as long as we never stop fighting for a better future, then there will be nothing that America cannot do."
  • "It is the spirit, daring and defiance, excellence and adventure, courage and confidence, loyalty and love that built this country into the most exceptional nation in the history of the world." 
  • "Our nation is stronger today than it ever was before. It is its strongest now."
President Trump has a great love of the military and shard that love tonight as well:
  • "Today, we come together as one nation with this very special salute to America. We celebrate our history, our people and the heroes who proudly defend our flag — the brave men and women of the United States military!"
  • "The future of American freedom rests on the shoulders of men and women willing to defend it. Now is the chance to join our military and make a truly great statement in life, and you should do it."
Some members of the National Guard. 
Military vehicle
The turnout was phenomenal, as the President shared:

In an especially exciting moment in the speech, the President shared: "Someday soon we will plant the American flag on Mars." (Image from NASA; more here.)

Perhaps the President's most important statement of all:  "Loyalty and love built this country into the most exceptional nation in the history of the world."
Free photo via Pixabay.
It was a day of excitement, followed of course by the traditional fireworks.

What is the significance of this day? We decided that enough was enough.

We are done with them.

We were done then.

And we are done, again, now.

Let us join together and celebrate our freedom.
To peace. Free photo via Pixabay.
By Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal. Public domain. All opinions are the author's own.

The Demonic Exploitation Of Women, By Women

Miley Cyrus has been degraded for so many years. Examples:

* 12/11/2015 - "Baby Talk" ("BB Talk") music video. Obviously this is beyond sick. Analysis by Vigilant Citizen is here.

* 6/5/2019 - "Black Mirror: Rachel, Jack, and Ashley Too" (Season 5, Episode 3) - she is a mind-controlled music star. In it, she sings a song ("Head Like A Hole" by Nine Inch Nails) with lyrics that talk about devil worship ("bow down before the one you serve; you're going to get what you deserve").

This is the real Miley in the video. But her character is clearly hardened.
It shows an innocent little girl who doesn't belong in the bar, but she is there, and she watches Miley admiringly. There is a little doll next to her with an "anarchy" symbol.
The image of the little girl with the AI-looking "anarchy" doll brings to mind a moment from "I, Pet Goat, II." An umbilical cord connects the child to a terrifying figure that "protects" it, but takes over its mind - a handler.

We know it's an umbilical cord because there is a direct image of a fetus preceding this.
It is worth watching Dr. Michael Brown talking to Milo about "the demonic roots of abortion," with a focus on the desperate aim of the cabal to kill kids.

The girl sitting at the bar also made me think of Comet Ping Pong and Pizza and how troubling it was (aside from the Instagram we remember) that they seemed to cross boundaries between adult and child entertainment.

Finally I thought about the links between anarchy and pedophilia. How the notion that "there are no rules other than consent" feeds into the idea that "a child can consent." You can see a discussion about this here.

The reason I bring all this up right now is that you can see a definite attempt to degrade women happening, and the degradation is closely linked to oppression by the mother.

Yesterday, the music video "Mother's Daughter" premiered.This is another Miley Cyrus-fronted song, but she appears completely possessed and not in control of herself. Particularly in this frame, she is shaking and shuddering as though literally inhabited by a demon.
The images include a mother gloating at her possession of her infant child. It is not love we see on her face.
And a scene where Cyrus repeats, "my momma always told me that I'd make it," with a clear vision of an evil mother and her controlled child.
Another example:

"Former Disney child star Bella Thorne says she was "molested from [the age of] 6-14... abused all the time... people have no idea the type mistreatment I was dealing with [while at Disney] that everyone around me saw and did nothing." - "John Doe" on Twitter

Her mother did not know. Or did she? Imagine the desperate loneliness of this child, and her mother somehow did not help her.

Do you notice that not a day goes by without an intrusion from the priestesses of this cult? Or their victims?

Why exactly is washed-up Madonna performing at an international music festival with her satanic getup?
Everyone taunted AOC for screaming at the Border Patrol. Has anyone considered that she is a victim of the cult?

Why was she chosen to run for office? What does she get for saying these insane things day after day? (See separate article linking her "handler" Chakrabarti to Bill Clinton.)

I have no doubt that someone from the cabal infiltrated a Facebook group and posted a disgusting image of AOC to traumatize, degrade and humiliate her.

Take a good look at this picture with this sign, "Free the Children."
Is it not possible that AOC is mentally controlled, and that someone has accessed her programming - so that she really believes what she is saying is true?

Sound farfetched? There is apparently an alleged connection between AOC and Cheryl Mills, lawyer and "top aide" to HRC. (AOC, Kennedy, West Africa, pregnant mothers)

Family desperate economic situation - vulnerable. Father had just passed away when she was a sophomore in college, in 2008.Sometime between 2008 and 2011 she goes to West Africa. Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State 2009-2013. Staff paths could've crossed 2009-2010 or so.

Hillary Clinton linked to Haiti - special interest in Haiti. African-American "human trafficking numbers among highest in the country." Melanin health benefits. Targeting "young black boys" in particular for organ harvesting. Another kind of human trafficking - essentially a form of cannibalism.

August 6, 2012: "Clinton Promotes Investment In Africa."

Hillary Clinton "clean stoves" project - in Africa and Haiti (the Haiti link says it's not cyber-secure; I can't get to the original) - countries with boys with melanin.

The "clean cookstove" project (which somehow looped in the UN and climate change) was an expensive, useless debacle.

August 1, 2012. The priestess at work. Look at the visual here and you can see the true power dynamic.
I can easily imagine "AOC" interning for Kennedy who introduced her to someone associated with Clinton who sent her to Africa to work with Mills and from there she became...useful.

They take whoever they can get. They use whoever is useful. Like Ilhan Omar, a refugee, also financially desperate.
Who is behind the European rape wave? Is it really women beating other women into submission, by sending men to humiliate them?

Why was it so important to show disgraced UK resigning prime minister globalist IMF chief Christine Lagarde in particular humiliating Ivanka Trump?

Because this is some powerful woman's sick fantasy?

Go back to Webb's tweet. We have no proof that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez worked for Mills. That said, here are three discussions of Cheryl Mills and "Black Ivy" (Source 1; Source 2; Source 3) I never saw something so complicated as this in all my life.

See this thread by @CarrollQuigley1 which ties in Nike. He says: "My gut tells me Nike may be working with BlackIvy Group which is the company Mills started to exploit her Clinton cartel connections. "

Speaking of priestesses....Megan Rapinoe used to be such a nice girl.
Notice anything different?
We all know what is happening.

Why do you think President Trump's spiritual adviser is a female? Why is she wearing red as she casts out the demons?
We are dealing with a force rising from the depths of evil itself.

It has taken on a female form. Embodied by Hillary Clinton perhaps, but spreading far beyond her.

Spoiler: God wins.

By Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal. All opinions are the author's own. Public domain. You can read the thread here as well. Photo sources: screenshots.

The 5 Tasks Of A Federal Public Affairs Specialist

It's Not About "Public Relations"
The U.S. Government Accountability Office published a report in 2016 referring to "Public Relations Spending" by the Federal government but the title is misleading as the Federal government is not allowed to engage in public relations. That is, unless the money is "specifically appropriated for that purpose."

Per the GAO, as summarized by the Congressional Research Service, this means that Congressional appropriations may not be used to do things like extol the greatness of the agency, convey a partisan message, or hide the fact that the government is talking.

What Do You Mean "We Can't Tell Good News Stories?"

While most agencies understand that they cannot behave in a partisan manner, and cannot offer up covert propaganda, it is frequently difficult for leadership to conceive of the fact that they aren't supposed to use their 1035s to make the agency look good.

Perhaps to avoid the toxic waste dump that "spin" has become, the Public Relations Society of America casts PR as relationship-building, calling it in "a strategic communication process that builds mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and their publics."

Nevertheless, from a Federal government point of view, we are not supposed to "build mutually beneficial relationships" with anyone. This is because the end goal of a "mutually beneficial relationship" is to make the customer look good, and we generally are not allowed to do this on the taxpayer's dime.

At this point you may be scratching your head, wondering exactly how it is that the Federal government spends $1 billion a year "not" making itself look good.

However, there is much to communicate about in the realm of "public information," and the GAO lays out exactly what constitutes legitimate spending in this area.

Five Categories Of Communication That Are Always Appropriate

The below is adapted for simplicity; anything on the list below would be considered OK to spend money on.
• General information: Anything you would find in the "About Us" section of a website is covered by this category. It may sound kind of bland, but the information to be found here would typically be of interest to Congress, the media, and the public with respect to accountability and transparency.
• Customer service: Typically, the public has questions about what the agency does that are not anticipated by the agency itself (often there are suggestions as well). This kind of communication is responsive to those questions without judging whether they're "legitimate," "important," "appropriate," "fair," and so on.
• Compliance: In order for citizens to follow the law, they have to know what the law is. It is critical that government agencies clearly explain what people are supposed to do in order to fulfill their obligations. Anything in that category goes here.
• Social marketing: The government has an incredible amount of benefits, information, products and services on offer that many people don't know they are entitled to and can't figure out how to take advantage of. Communication in this category bridges that gap and encourages people to take advantage of this. And while some would limit the term "social marketing" in ways that refer specifically to health or lifestyle issues, there are other offerings (such as business opportunities, public auctions, educational options, and more) that can substantially improve the citizen's quality of life. All communication of this type goes here.
• Recruitment: Without human beings, the government cannot fulfill its basic functions. Therefore, it is legitimate for agencies to spend money to fill and refill their talent pipelines. Recruitment can take the form of everything from educational sessions, to job advertising, to open houses, and more.

How To Say It

Not only are government agencies limited in terms of what they can say, they are also proscribed in the way that they can say it.

Specifically, it is now legally required to talk to people in a way that they can easily understand; the term we use for this is "plain language."

The Duty To Serve The Citizen

But there is more. What happens when the Federal communicator is asked to communicate to the public in ways that serve the agency, but not the public interest?

Although there is no legal framework that addresses this specific question, a parallel can be found in the mandate of the public lawyer to serve the public interest first as the communicator understands it.

In 1973, The Professional Ethics Committee of The Federal Bar Association ("The Government Client and Confidentiality: Opinion 73-1," 32 FED. B.J. 71, 72) stated:

"The government lawyer assumes a public trust, for the government, over-all and in each of its parts, is responsible to the people in our democracy with its representative form of government. Each part of the government has the obligation of carrying out, in the public interest, its assigned responsibility in a manner consistent with the Constitution, and the applicable laws and regulations. In contrast, the private practitioner represents the client's personal or private interest."
(Source: Josephson and Pearce, "To Whom Does the Government Lawyer Owe the Duty of Loyalty When Clients Are in Conflict," FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History, 1986, pp. 555-556)

Josephson and Pearce elaborate:

"This special responsibility of the government lawyer can be broadly construed to permit and indeed require the government lawyer only to represent government officials who are acting in accord with what she views as the public interest."

Professional Codes of Conduct

In addition to the Employee Standards of Conduct for civil servants and the Hatch Act, the National Association of Government Communicators (NAGC), an independent body of professionals at the Federal, state, and local levels, has an extensive code of conduct that, if followed, will support the Federal public affairs specialist in carrying out their duties legally and ethically.

The problem is, none of the above specifically outline the duties that a Federal "1035" actually has, and as such, their time can easily be filled with nonessential duties at best and heavily self-promotional activities at worst.

Five Recommendations
Currently, there is no clear and consistently applied model for Federal communication standards outside what can be extracted from GAO reports. So how can professional public affairs specialists focus on doing more of the substantive work they are supposed to do, and less self-promotional stuff on behalf of the agency, regardless of their pay grade?
• Take advantage of natural inflection points: Every four years, with the incoming transition team, there is an opportunity to provide a briefing on public affairs activities and priorities. These teams favor a smoothly running organization. Focus on demonstrating that communication activities are coherently organized, fall into the allowed categories, and are on track.
• Measure, measure, measure: Leaders rely heavily on summarized metrics reports, and you have the opportunity to devise ways of measuring the activities you're engaging in as well as their results. Even a short one-pager consisting of the feedback you received from key stakeholders that week, delivered regularly, will help to focus them on activities that consistently receive positive feedback, which tend to be those that fall into the categories that are allowed.
• Standard operating procedures: Create written standard operating procedures for public affairs activities and refer consistently to them. You can use a Sharepoint-type environment to treat these SOPs as a wiki, with continuous updates as needed. The point is to refer to something that is in writing as much as possible, rather than getting into differences of opinion.
• Know where to go with ethics concerns: Document activities undertaken clearly, consistently, and with tracking numbers so that decisions made are traceable to the responsible individual or group. If anything occurs that you have legal or ethics questions about, follow appropriate procedures to express your concerns, beginning with your supervisor.
• Take advantage of training and networking opportunities: When you attend training sessions, you not only gain the perspective of those who have addressed the same issues as you, but you also obtain the opportunity to discuss complex issues and concerns with your colleagues. NAGC, the Federal Communicators Network, and the General Services' Administration's Digital Gov Communities of Practice are all great options to start with.

Quality Federal communication is a sacred duty. "Doing what is right" means serving the agency in the context of serving the public as a whole. That is a bedrock principle, it applies regardless of who is running the government, and it should never be a question in any civil servant's mind.
By Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal. All opinions are the author's own. Free photo by Mohamed Hasan via Pixabay.

Search This Blog